The SEIS for the future, instead of being a community Overall, it could become a vast and fragmented network of isolated individuals interact with their data and not with people. We are therefore faced a double-edged sword from which speech and the Magisterium of the church for several decades. Moreover, it is the reflection at this point, whether it is possible to really consider this process, called communication as a process of exchange or share, as originally had been identified, and that today prevail in human relations focused on meeting needs , ie focusing on end.
In this sense, it should go to Habermas, to clarify that definitely the problem of modernity has not been resolved as it has been approached from technical reason, namely that man has favored joint means for controlling the external environment, taking this as a result of technical development, unlike what would happen if they address the problem of modernity from the practical reason, which would result in the understanding of the subject, which is exactly what we think is missing in this moment in history.
With this we state that according to Habermas reflection of solving the problem of modernity would be meaningless through practical reason and with this, through practical communication would be illocutionary. In this sense, Habermas, well be argued that postmodernism redemption of reason and communicative action.
By distinguishing between reflective thinking and thinking calculator, you can clearly conclude that what we need as a "modern world" is to use a reflective thinking, a way of thinking, where man first of all be concerned think of himself. Therefore we can say that what happens with modernity is that we are in the flight of thought, ie we are not thinking reflectively. Therefore we believe that what we need, is a communication oriented to understanding, understanding, true communication between subjects, but this one aspect of reality would not be sufficient if there were no technical knowledge, more oriented to control and domain, so we agree with Habermas and his idea of \u200b\u200bfinding a balance between the interests of technical knowledge and interests of the interaction, ie , move in the technical domains (relationship between) and the practical (communicative subject-subject)
For all the above, we can say that if we consider that the media today are not human have evolved in a favorable way for direct human relations, warm and natural, may, notwithstanding the above, change order, ie move be mere sources of information to be true links between individuals, affective, emotional and experiential general to share, so maybe this way, producing a universal level change in terms of modernity and inclusiveness which we live and we have failed to address in an integrated way.
0 comments:
Post a Comment